Pangram Reviews

I'm stunned at how many false positives this generates. Large sections of my original dissertation research are being identified as 100% AI created, even though they include my own themes from more than 30 interviews, original research questions I formulated over two years ago specific to my project, and much more. I'm amazed at how wrong it is, yet everyone seems to be using it now.

This site is totally awful and frequently wrong. My professors have told me there's basically no way this could be that inaccurate, but clearly I'm the unlucky exception. I've had to oversimplify so many of my papers because the site flags any sophisticated vocabulary as AI. It's ridiculous and honestly it's making people worse writers. I can't even put together a quality essay anymore without stressing about getting flagged. If your professor or employer uses this tool to check work, good luck because you're going to spend an enormous amount of time rewriting for absolutely nothing. 1 out of 10.

I'm using this tool for my university coursework and it's full of inconsistencies and wrong results. When I check individual paragraphs that I wrote myself without any AI assistance, it says they're 100% human. But when I submit all those same paragraphs together without making any changes, suddenly it says they're 100% AI. How does that even happen? This proves the program's algorithms are unreliable, broken, and totally inaccurate. Schools should stop relying on this for grading student work.

UPDATE: After getting another chance and talking with my academic advisor, I had to simplify my paper down to basic middle school language just to pass the humanization check. My professor and advisor warned me against using other detection tools since they flag everything as AI. Despite this, my graduate school is investigating me for supposed AI use because of this program's results. I got a paid subscription to test how reliable this detector actually is. I uploaded 18 documents including personal stories and research papers. Out of these, EVERY single personal essay about my own life came back flagged as 100% AI (that's 10 of the 18 files). Four research papers showed as human-written. The other four included my college portfolio, a donation request letter, an obituary I wrote, and a short vacation essay, and ALL were marked as 100% AI. In total, 14 out of 18 files were flagged as AI just because of my writing style and sentence structure. This tool is unreliable and I can't recommend it.

I never get credited any points when I complete surveys on this platform.

This service is completely unreliable. I tested it with text that was 100% written by ChatGPT and it marked it as fully human made. Then I tried with an essay I personally wrote that was very well researched, and it said it was completely AI. The results make no sense.

The AI percentage keeps changing every time I check it. The results are not reliable at all.

This tool was super helpful in distinguishing between AI-generated content and original writing in my papers. Really appreciate it.

This tool just doesn't work right. I put in 5 sentences and it says fully human written. Add just 1 more sentence and suddenly all 6 are 100% AI. When I combine those same 6 with a longer document containing hundreds of sentences, it claims 40% is AI. Remove it and it drops to 20% of the text being AI, even though everything was written by me. The program flags normal content like 'Temperature 100 - 1000 molecules, temperature 200 - 1300 molecules' as completely AI. I'd give it 0 out of 100. Total waste of money with zero useful results. You claim less than 0.01% error rate, but this is just completely random. I'll get 30% AI on a text, then run it again an hour later with no changes and get 40%, and the next day it's 25% different again. This is useless at detecting AI. Not recommended.

Works well. Gives me the detailed information I'm looking for. Plus I really like that it connects with Google Docs.