McGraw-Hill Reviews

The refund timeline on their policy says 21 days from purchase. We're now at 40 days with two separate customer service calls and still no refund. Every representative I speak with just redirects me without actually helping.

According to their return policy, refunds should be issued within 21 days. It's now been 40 days, I've called twice, and still nothing. The customer service people just pass me along without actually resolving anything.

This textbook presents a very narrow political perspective throughout. Nearly every example and reference aligns with a single viewpoint, with nothing representing other schools of thought. The few figures mentioned are presented as if they're the only reasonable ones, except perhaps one you might consider moderate. Looking deeper into the chapters, the authors highlight individuals who have faced criticism for dishonesty and questionable claims, particularly regarding recent public health topics. Can you seriously expect students to view this as credible material? What's needed here are better-quality writers and more balanced editorial oversight. The sheer number of one-star reviews suggests there are many other operational problems customers are complaining about too.

The content in this textbook feels heavily slanted. Every perspective presented aligns with one particular political viewpoint, with absolutely nothing representing alternative positions. Most of the figures mentioned lean heavily in one direction, except possibly one who could be considered balanced. When you examine the material more closely, they cite individuals who have been widely criticized for spreading misinformation and making questionable claims about recent events. This includes media personalities known for controversial takes. How can anyone trust the material when it's this one-sided? The textbook needs authors with more diverse viewpoints and stronger editorial standards. Looking at the overwhelming number of one-star reviews here, it's clear the company has plenty of other issues customers are frustrated with as well.

The whole process takes forever, the difficulty level is unreasonable, and the automatic checkpoint system is absolutely useless and makes everything worse. Would rate it even lower if I could, all because of that checkpoint feature.

Way too much time is wasted just working through the interface. The questions themselves are unnecessarily difficult, and the automatic knowledge checks are absolutely terrible and ruin the whole experience. Rating would be even lower just because of how broken those checks are.

Every interaction I've had with their support team has been frustrating. I've needed to call several times to address problems with their difficult-to-use interface and confusing buying options. The representatives always sound completely disengaged. They're not helpful, often rude, and will bail on the conversation instantly. The actual website platform is problematic and overpriced on top of everything else.

The customer service team here has been consistently disappointing. I've had to reach out multiple times for various issues related to their confusing interface and awkward purchasing system. Every person I've talked to seems miserable and shows no interest in actually helping. They're dismissive and will hang up without hesitation. Beyond the poor service, the platform itself is clunky, buggy, and way too expensive for what you get.

I keep running into problems with my accounting coursework on this platform. The cost is not justified given how poorly it functions, almost like an unfinished prototype. Important details are regularly missing, which makes comprehension a real struggle. The question formatting is strange and makes it nearly impossible to select the right answer even when you actually know the content. There are also contradicting directions spread throughout the system. The whole thing looks like it was assembled hastily without any quality control.

My accounting assignments through this service are constantly problematic. For the price they charge, the quality is terrible like a rough beta version. Information gets left out regularly, making it hard to follow along. The way questions are worded is confusing and makes correct answers seem wrong even when you actually understand the material. Plus there are contradictory instructions throughout. It feels like someone put this together in an afternoon without proofreading.